|
Viewed from a
distance, an Indian village may appear deceptively simple. A cluster
of mud-plastered walls shaded by a few trees, set among a stretch of
green or dun-colored fields, with a few people slowly coming or going,
oxcarts creaking, cattle lowing, and birds singing--all present an
image of harmonious simplicity.
Indian city
dwellers often refer nostalgically to "simple
village life." City artists portray
colorfully garbed village women gracefully carrying water pots on
their heads, and writers describe isolated rural settlements unsullied
by the complexities of modern urban civilization. Social scientists of
the past wrote of Indian villages as virtually self-sufficient
communities with few ties to the outside world.
In actuality, Indian
village life is far from simple. Each village is connected through a
variety of crucial horizontal linkages with other villages and with
urban areas both near and far. Most villages are characterized by a
multiplicity of economic, caste, kinship, occupational, and even
religious groups linked vertically within each settlement.
Factionalism is a typical feature of village politics. in one of the
first of the modern anthropological studies of Indian village life,
anthropologist Oscar Lewis called this complexity "rural
cosmopolitanism."
|